Chess Tsunami Hits San Francisco Bay

by admin on September 4, 2018

When you are an adult playing chess in the San Francisco Bay area, it sometimes feels as if you are that last person holding your finger in the dike, trying to keep the sea of young players from completely wiping out the older generation. Sometimes, the old folks actually do win. And then there are times when the kids smash through the dike, around the dike, and over the dike, and nothing and no one can stand in their path. That was this weekend at the CalChess Labor Day tournament, the official championship of Northern California.

I just want you to take a look at the four top finishers.

  1. Christopher Yoo, 5½-½. Christopher is the #1 eleven-year-old in the country.
  2. Joshua Sheng, 5-1. Joshua is the #4 seventeen-year-old in the country.
  3. Andrew Zhang Hong, 4½-1½. Andrew is the #2 thirteen-year-old in the country.
  4. Rochelle Wu, 4-2. Rochelle is the #2 twelve-year-old in the country.

Now admittedly, there were some grownups who tied with Rochelle. Grandmaster Enrico Sevillano, FIDE Master Ezra Chambers, and plain ol’ National Master Derek O’Connor also scored 4-2. (Correction added later: O’Connor actually tied for third with 4½. Sorry about the mistake.) But I would say that the domination of the teenagers (and pre-teens!) was pretty complete. Christopher Yoo is most likely the youngest Northern California State Champion ever. Just four years ago he won the state championship of first-graders! Is that sick, or what?!

Here are a couple of the decisive positions from the tournament. I apologize to Grandmaster Sevillano, for whom this is going to look like Enrico’s Lost Weekend … but he was the favorite after all, and when a grandmaster goes down to defeat twice in one weekend, it’s news.

Position after 39. … Bf4. White to move.

FEN: 4r1k1/1bq2p1p/6p1/3p4/1PnNnb2/5N1P/5PP1/BR2QBK1 w – – 0 40

This position is from round three, the game Sevillano versus O’Connor. It’s the last move of the time control, so one may assume that both players are low on time. Sevillano played the White side of the Ruy Lopez, also known as the “Spanish torture,” but in this position it is White who is getting tortured. All of his pieces are passive, while Black’s pieces are dominating the board.

Nevertheless, White can continue the struggle with 40. g3, putting the question to the bishop. It can stay on the b8-h2 diagonal or it can stay on the h6-c1 diagonal, but it should not be allowed to do both.

Instead, whether it’s because of exhaustion defending an inferior position, or because of time pressure, Sevillano slips.

40. Qd1?? …

Do you see the problem with this move? O’Connor may have had only seconds left, but against a grandmaster you won’t get any more chances like this one!

40. … Nxf2!

Ouch! This really isn’t even a sacrifice, because after 41. Kxf2 Be3+ 42. Ke2 Bxd4+ 43. Kd3 Bxa1 Black gets his piece back and another one to spare, because 44. Rxa1 would run into a king-queen fork with 44. … Nb2+. Sevillano tried for some trickery with 41. Qa4, but after 41. … Ra8 Black had, as they say, the pawn and the compensation, and went on to win very easily.

O’Connor, by the way, is also a bit of a chess newcomer, although he’s in his twenties. He played only a small number of tournaments as a teenager, but then moved to Berkeley after college, started teaching at the Berkeley Chess School around 2015 or 2016, and also started playing in tournaments himself. His rating is still going up rapidly (this tournament moved him from 2312 to 2340), and one has to think that these are rating points he could have gained as a teenager if he had been playing chess back then.

Sevillano’s loss to O’Connor set up an exciting last round matchup between Sevillano (with a 4-1 score) and Yoo (who had a 4½-½ score). Because Sevillano was a half-point behind, he could not play for a draw, and this turned out to be quite important. Around move 30 Yoo gave Sevillano a chance to claim a draw by repetition. To his credit, the grandmaster would not accept a draw — but that put pressure on him to create an attack where one really didn’t exist. Then this disaster happened.

Position after 34. … Rc8. White to move.

FEN: 1kr4r/pb6/1p2p3/3nPp2/P2Q1P2/2pR2PP/2P1qBB1/2R3K1 w – – 0 35

In this position, which came from a Winawer Variation of the French Defense, Black (Sevillano) has just moved his rook from d8 to c8. It’s hard for me to figure out what he was thinking here. The pawn on c3 was not really in danger, but something else in Black’s position is in grave danger…

35. Bf3! …

This traps the queen. Although Black does have a way out, sort of (see next note), the ransom is too high.

35. … Rxh3?

Maybe 35. … Nxf4 would have had a better chance at rattling his young foe. If 36. Bxe2 Nxe2+ wins the queen back by a fork, and if White avoids the fork with 37. Qd6+ Ka8 38. Bxe2 Nxe2+ 39. Kf1 Nxc1, Black has a ton of compensation. Instead, White should just play 36. Qxf4 Rxh3 (again, trying to rattle White — the queen is still taboo because of mate on h1) 37. Bxb7 Kxb7 38. Qf3+ with a won endgame for White.

I don’t know if 35. … Rxh3 was a miscalculation or if Sevillano just gave up. It really is jarring to see a grandmaster give away his queen for essentially nothing.

36. Bxe2 Nxf4 (too late) 37. Kf1 Bg2+ 38. Ke1 Rh1+ 39. Bg1 Nh3 40. Bf1 Rxg1 and Black resigned. After 41. Qxg1 the win for White would have been child’s play (literally).

Congratulations to our new eleven-year-old state champion!

P.S. Some of you might be wondering: How did I do in the tournament? I decided not to play. It was a tough call, but I’ve been having some sleep issues, which my doctor calls “dream enactment behavior.” It’s when you thrash or move violently during your dreams. That’s really only a symptom; the likely diagnosis is REM sleep disorder. He has prescribed sleep medication to see if that can control the behavior, and I just didn’t want to play in a tournament the first weekend after starting on the sleeping pills.

Print Friendly

{ 5 comments }

Epic Fails

by admin on September 1, 2018

In my blog posts I probably give the impression that I win most of my games against the computer. Of course, it’s only natural that I prefer to show the games where I played well. Also, because I intend this blog to have some instructional value for human players, I feel as if my readers will be more interested in games where I can explain the thinking process behind the moves. In a game where the computer wins, it’s difficult to say anything about its “thinking process,” which is completely different from a human’s.

Nevertheless it’s important to learn from our losses, and there is a particular category of losses against the computer that I would call “epic fails.” These are the games that leave me wondering, “What the hell just happened?” Games I should have won but lost, or games where I didn’t see any danger and all of a sudden the computer finds a tactic that wins material. Today I’ll show you three of them, which all took place in August.

Epic Fail 1: No Such Thing as a Routine Trade

Position after 53. … Bg2. White to move.

FEN: 8/6RP/4k3/1p6/6PK/2r5/3N2b1/5n2 w – – 0 54

For White, this position is about one thing and one thing only: queening the h-pawn. But of course, 54. h8Q? is no good because of 54. … Rh3+, deposing the newly crowned White monarch. How can White ensure a successful coronation?

(Space inserted in case you want to think about it.)

The answer is that White wins with 54. Kg5! and amazingly, Black has no way to stop the pawn. If 54. … Rh3 55. Rg6+! Kf7 56. Rh6 Rxh6 57. Kxh6. If 54. … Rc8 55. Rg8. And if 54. … Rc5+ 55. Kf4 and the g-pawn conveniently prevents … Rh5. Finally, if Black tries a hail Mary and lets the pawn queen with 54. … Nxd2 55. h8Q Ne4+, White has a flight square with 56. Kg6. (But not 56. Kf4?? Rf3+ 57. Kxe4 Rf8+.)

I think the main reason I overlooked this line was that I didn’t see the little dance with Rg6+ and Rh6. Plus, I had only seconds left. Instead I played what I thought was a routine trade, 54. Nxf1??? But there are no routine trades against a computer! What is the move I overlooked?

The answer is once again a king move: 54. … Kf6! To my utter disbelief, the game is now lost: Black has closed a mating net around my king. In order to escape the mate I have to give up my rook, and then of course the pawn promotion is prevented too. White resigned.

This was a bitter loss for several reasons. Shredder’s strength was set at only 2004, and when its rating is that low, I usually expect to beat it. Not only that, it had started the game playing the Borg Defense (or Grob Reversed), 1. e4 g5?! and so I had literally had the advantage from move 1 to move 53. Nevertheless, one “routine” move on move 54 turned victory into instant defeat.

Epic Fail 2: The Bone in the Throat

Position after 29. … Qxf4+. White to move.

FEN: 1n1r2k1/5ppp/4p3/1QP3P1/1P1B1q1P/p7/P1B5/2K1R3 w – – 0 30

Again I’m White, and this time Shredder’s rating is set at 2371. I had missed a win earlier in the game, and now Shredder has extremely dangerous counterplay.

In particular, a key piece is that pawn at a3, which I call a “bone-in-the-throat pawn.” Shredder loves pushing pawns to a3/a6 or h3/h6, and this game shows why. It constantly creates problems for me. Back-rank checks can become back-rank mates, and if Black can ever get his queen on the long diagonal, the check on b2 could be deadly.

On the other hand, Black has back-rank issues too. So, just like our last example, it is an incredibly tense position.

What is the best way for White to get out of check?

30. Be3??

Automatic… and wrong! Of course you can understand that I wanted to save the bishop and remain a piece ahead. But this move just walks into a mating net. Similar to our last game. I think that mating nets are harder for humans to spot than computers, especially with limited time.

30. … Qe5!

Once again I was left with a feeling of “What the hell just happened?” One moment I thought I was a piece ahead. The next moment, I’m getting checkmated.

31. Bd2 Qa1+

In my concern over … Qb2+, I never even noticed this move! The point is that after 32. Bb1 Qb2+ now forces mate next move. So…

White resigns.

What should I have done in the diagrammed position instead? In a word: Not lose. Because 30. Be3 loses by force, and both king moves look awful (e.g., 30. Kd1 Qxd4+ 31. Ke2 Qd2+ and … Qxc2), there’s only one move left: 30. Re3!

This move changes everything! If 30. … Rxd4?? 31. Qe8 mate! and if 30. … Qxd4 31. Rxa3 gets rid of the “bone-in-the-throat pawn” and Black has nothing better than a draw by perpetual check after 31. … Qa1+ 32. Bb1 Rd1+ 33. Kxd1 Qxb1+.

Why didn’t I find this move? In short, because it looks so terrible! It places the rook into a pin, and it’s only defended by a bishop that is, shall we say, a dead bishop walking. So the question has to be asked, what if Black doesn’t take on d4 yet but first creates luft for his king with 30. Re3 g6?

Well, it’s hard to give a definite answer, but Rybka says that White is completely equal after 31. Qe2! White’s idea is basically not to waste time shedding tears for the bishop, but instead to maximize his one asset: the passed b- and c-pawns. After 31. … Qxd4 32. Rd3 looks good enough to equalize. And after 31. … Rxd4 32. b5! White is prepared to give up all of his kingside pawns to push his queenside pawns. This is really too complicated for human analysis, but the main point is: White has a chance. In the other lines, White had no chance. As the mathematicians say, Q.E.D.

Epic Fail 3: Trusting Your Opponent


Position after 12. … Bb4. White to move.

FEN: rnbk2r1/ppp2p1p/8/3P4/1b1P1Bq1/2N2Q2/PPP4P/R4KNR w – – 0 13

Once again I’m playing White, in a position that came from a King’s Gambit. I was pretty happy here. I’m a pawn up and just one move away from completing my development, while Black is two moves away (at least). Would you believe that White is going to resign this position two moves from now?

13. Ne4 …

Nothing wrong with this move. I’m threatening to fork the queen and rook with 14. Nf6.

13. … Bf5

What’s this? Shredder isn’t even paying attention to my threat?

In my confusion, I convinced myself that I was losing after 14. Nf6 Qxf3 15. Nxf3 Bh3+ 16. Ke2 Rg2+ 17. Kd3 Rf2, when the unfortunate lineup of White pieces on the f-file costs me a piece. But it’s not true! Rybka says that after 18. Ke3 Rxc2 19. Rac1 White stands much better. For example, 19. … Rxc1 20. Rxc1 Bd6 21. Ng5. The twist at the end of the combination!

I trusted my opponent too much. But even if I couldn’t see that far, I still have another perfectly good move. Even better than 14. Nf6 is 14. Nf2! Qxf3 15. Nxf3, when 15. … Bxc2 does not win a pawn because of 16. Rc1 Ba4 17. Bxc7+. (But not 17. Rxc7?? Bb5+!)

So in fact I trusted my opponent in a second way! In both of these variations I thought that losing the pawn on c2 was some kind of disaster, but really it didn’t hurt me at all.

Thinking that the pawn on c2 was my biggest weakness, I overlooked something much bigger.

14. c3?? Qxf3

Oh, no! 15. Nxf3 Bxe4 16. cb Bxf3 loses a piece. One more good-looking game ruined.

White resigns.

Print Friendly

{ 2 comments }

It’s All About Timing

August 27, 2018

Who do you think is better in this position? What is White’s plan, and what should he do next move? Position after 25. … Nf8. White to move. FEN: r3rnk1/4pp2/1qnpb1p1/p1p3Pp/PpP1PP1N/1P1P2QP/1RN1B3/5R1K w – – 0 26 In this game I was playing White against Shredder, the computer, set at a 2050 rating. It had thrashed around […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Abstract Versus Concrete

August 24, 2018

Here’s a game I played against the computer that I thought was really interesting — not in a “fireworks” way but in a “strategical planning” way. It went down to a queen-and-pawn endgame, but what is interesting is that the endgame was present as a looming possibility throughout the middlegame, and affected all the middlegame […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Dolg, Nyega, and A Gentleman in Moscow

August 20, 2018

Why not start out the week with a book review? Okay, I admit it will take us off topic, but I really enjoyed Amor Towles’ novel A Gentleman in Moscow and would like to encourage other people to read it. I remember my Russian teacher in college expounding at length on certain concepts he felt […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

A Reunion and a Paradox

August 13, 2018

Three posts in three days! Woo-hoo! I’m not promising to make it four for four, though. Last night I had a reunion with a former student of mine named Cole Ryan. He was one of the few kids who stuck with the Aptos Library Chess Club all the way through high school. (And he also […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

The Statute of Limitations

August 12, 2018

Two posts in one weekend! Just for fun, here is another game between me and my computer. It’s a King’s Gambit that goes a little bit haywire, but most unexpectedly goes all the way down to an opposite color bishops endgame. I find it fairly hard to beat the computer with the King’s Gambit. It […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Master of Improvisation

August 11, 2018

Master of Business Administration, Master of Chess, … All of these titles describe Mike Splane, but I would like to add a new one to them: Master of Improvisation. Mike sent around an e-mail yesterday with a game he had just played at the Kolty Club on Thursday night. It obviously had to be something […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Matrix Redux

August 2, 2018

I’ve posted here many times before about my training method called “Matrix chess,” which is the only useful way I’ve ever found of training against a computer. (Well, of course you can use computers to study openings, but that’s different. Here I’m talking about trying to use the computer to improve your chess skills.) In […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Sacrificing Your Opponent’s Pieces

July 28, 2018

Almost two weeks ago, Mike Splane hosted his latest chess party. This one was a special occasion, because we had a chance to welcome back Steven Zierk, whom Mike introduced as “the first GM ever from the Kolty Chess Club.” It’s a bit of a stretch, but Steven did go to the Kolty Club in […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →