Results — CalChess State Championship 2014

by admin on September 1, 2014

This weekend I played in the CalChess (i.e., northern California) state championship, which was well organized and well attended. We had in the neighborhood of 250 to 260 players, which means among other things that we trounced southern California, which had “only” 160 or so.

Bay Area Chess, which organized this tournament as well as most of the tournaments in this area, has come a long way. When I first played in a Bay Area Chess tournament, about ten years ago, it consisted of 96 kids and 4 adults. It took a very long time for adult chess players to warm up to the idea of playing in these tournaments that had so many kids. But they have finally come around. This tournament had a stellar field with 4 grandmasters (Ioan Chirila of Romania, Jesse Kraai, Oliver Barbosa, and Mark Paragua). And yes, there were lots of kids as there always are in Bay area tournaments, but it’s not such a huge proportion that you would feel as if you have come to a scholastic tournament by mistake.

This preamble was a cover for the fact that I actually don’t have the final word on who won the tournament. GM Barbosa went into the final round in the clear lead with 4½ points, after winning GM Chirila’s rook with a knight fork in a time scramble. It was no surprise that he agreed to a quick draw with NM Arun Sharma in the last round, giving him 5 points. Meanwhile, GM’s Chirila and Paragua battled it out to see if either could catch up with Barbosa. When I left, the game was still far from over, but it looked drawish to me.

The biggest news to me, however, was who tied for second (or third, depending on the Chirila-Paragua game). One of the group with 4½ points was National Master Arun Sharma. Arun has had a very unusual chess career. He is one of the few players I know who started young but had a huge rating surge after he was an adult. I knew him when he was a kid in Ohio back in the early 1990s. Then I moved away and heard nothing about him for a long time. In fact, he did not play any tournament chess from 2000 to 2009, during which time he was “just” a low master. In 2009 he started playing again and hung out at the “GM House” with Jesse Kraai, David Pruess, Josh Friedel, etc. The GM House was sort of an experiment at living in an all-chess, all-the-time environment. Ratings-wise, it didn’t seem to make much difference at all to the GM’s, but it made a huge difference to Arun! His rating took off from around 2250 to around 2450.

The other player tied with 4½ out of 6 was an even more remarkable story. It was Paul Richter, who went into the tournament as an expert. (Coincidentally, I just recorded a ChessLecture about a recent game where I beat him.) He went into today’s action with 2½ points out of 4, which was already pretty good, but then he had the kind of day you only dream about. He beat two International Masters in a row, Ricardo de Guzman (who is almost impossible to beat) and Vladimir Mezentsev. Note: Richter had never beaten an IM in his life before today. And then he got two in one day! He’ll gain at least 100 rating points, and will probably take home a check in the four-digit range. Oh. My. God.

Richter has always struck me as a pretty stoic type over the chess board. But after his win over Mezentsev, his face was flushed and he had a big smile. Well deserved! Even if you didn’t win first place, Paul, you are still the story of the tournament. His comment: “Even IM’s make mistakes.”

Now let’s talk about the expert section, which I played in. Teemu Virtanen and Joshua Cao tied for first with 5 points. Ladia Jirasek was all alone in third with 4½. And I was in a rather large tie with 4 points out of 6. I’ll win a small amount of prize money and gain a small number of rating points.

The first and third days were pretty good for me (2-0 on day one and 1½-½ today) but I really screwed up in between. In round three I agreed to a draw with Jirasek after having him totally crushed only a few moves earlier. Reason one was the time situation (3 minutes to make 5 moves) and reason 2 was that I had foolishly given him mating possibilities. So even though I was two pawns up, I was completely tied down defending the mates. I didn’t see any clear way to free myself, so when he offered me a draw I felt it was prudent to accept rather than to make some time-pressure blunder and lose. Then I lost to Virtanen in round four, or perhaps a better description would be that he stomped me. He outplayed me completely in the opening and middlegame, and we never got to the endgame.

I joked to Jirasek’s father that if he won first place, I wanted a cut of his prize money, seeing as how I gift-wrapped a draw for him in round three.

Finally, let me mention the curious thing that happened in round five. I agreed to a draw on move 13 against a class-A player named William Li! What happened was that I botched the opening really badly. I hated my position — either I would lose a pawn for no compensation or else I would be completely on the defensive for basically the rest of the game. As I was sitting there ruing my stupidity, my opponent offered me a draw!

I know that GM’s and IM’s routinely decline draw offers from lower-rated opponents, even when they know they have an inferior position. I thought, “What would my blog readers think if they found out I agreed to a draw on move 13?” Nevertheless, I only saw two options. One was to keep defending for 40 more moves and three more hours and perhaps get a draw if I was lucky. Two was to get a draw right away, no muss and no fuss. In the end, I had to take it.

In fact, I really think that offering the draw was a poor choice for Li, who missed a very good chance to upset an opponent rated 200 points higher than him. Winning such positions is a necessary part of his development. Instead he let himself be affected by the ratings and missed a learning opportunity.

My other three games (rounds 1, 2, and 6), were wins. Perhaps I will show some moments from them and the other games later, but I think this post is long enough as it is.

Remember, the “Comments” feature is broken at the moment, but if you want to make a comment please send it to me by e-mail to qxpch (at) yahoo (dot) com. I’ll assemble all non-spammy comments and post them here. Hopefully the “Comments” problem will be resolved soon and we can go back to working the way a blog should work.

Print Friendly

{ 0 comments }

Once again, I’m having problems with the Comment function on my blog. It seems to be a different problem this time from the ones earlier this year, but equally unsatisfactory. My blog is not accepting new comments, and all the old ones have disappeared as well.

I hope that this situation is temporary, because a blog with no comments is just a diary. I’ve e-mailed my Internet service provider and we’ll see what they come up with. I suspect that all the comments are still there, but some program is not talking to some other program any more. Isn’t it amazing how our technology can be working fine one day, and the next day (even though you haven’t made any changes) it doesn’t?

It’s spooky, actually. One of these days our computers will go on strike and we won’t have any idea what to do about it…

By the way, my next tournament will be this weekend, so I will certainly have some news here within the next few days. It’s the CalChess State Championship, and it promises to be a great tournament, with fourteen masters preregistered including the Sensei Jesse Kraai, Ioan Chirila (GM from Romania), David Pruess, and the newlywed Andy Lee, who will show us whether there is life in the chess sense after marriage.

I have a little bit of data on the “chess after marriage” question myself. The first two tournaments after I got married were great — I got my rating up to 2237 — but I was not able to sustain it. Whether it’s been real life getting in the way, or the natural aging process, or lack of talent, I’m pretty much at the same low master/high expert point that I was when I got married 25 years ago.

I’d love to hear what you think about any of this, but since comments aren’t working for the time being, here is an alternative. If you want to say something, send an e-mail to me at qxpch (at) yahoo (dot) com, and I promise I will post any non-spammy comments in a separate blog entry. Hopefully this solution will only be necessary for a very short while.

P.S. I am probably going to play in the Expert section this time, not the Master section, so those of you hoping for Mackenzie-Pruess II (or even Mackenzie-Kraai II) will be disappointed.

Print Friendly

{ 0 comments }

Hallucinations and Beauty

August 26, 2014

At Mike Splane’s chess party I showed a game I played against Paul Richter (a teen-aged expert and soon-to-be master, with a rating around 2180) that I’m also planning to give a ChessLecture on. The game had a beautiful finish, but I also had a curious blind spot that might have cost me the victory […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Another Master?

August 24, 2014

At Mike Splane’s latest chess party, which was held today, Juande Perea showed three of his games from the recent Kolty Club Championship, which he won in impressive style. Juande scored 5-0 in the games he actually played, plus he took two half-point byes for non-chess reasons, so he ended with a score of 6-1. […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Olympiad is Over

August 14, 2014

The last round of the Chess Olympiad is in the books and, no surprise, China won. They beat Poland, 3-1, making any discussion of tiebreaks academic. As I mentioned in my previous entry, they completed the event with only one loss out of 44 games, a truly dominating performance. Hungary (the only team to even […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

One Round to Go

August 13, 2014

With one round to go in the chess Olympiad, the U.S. is still in contention for… something, and the gold-medal team is in my opinion all but decided. China beat France in round 10, taking over sole first place with 17 points (7 wins, 3 ties). The only team that could pass them is Hungary, […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Quick Olympiad Update, Plus Dana’s Solution to World Politics

August 11, 2014

Bobby Fischer can breathe a sigh of relief. If only he were still breathing, that is. Sam Shankland isn’t going to beat his record of 19 consecutive wins, because Sam drew in round nine of the Olympiad. Still a good result for Sam — a draw as Black against a higher-rated player, Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu. The […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Only 12 Games Behind Fischer!

August 10, 2014

What do Mathias Ssonko, Martin Martinez, David Gluckman, Aman Hambleton, Guillermo Vazquez, Jahongir Vakhidov, and Judit Polgar have in common? Answer: They are the victims of the juggernaut that has been Sam Shankland at the Chess Olympiad in Tromsø, Norway. After eight rounds of the tournament, Shankland (the alternate for the U.S. team) has a […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Rip Van Winkle Returns

August 1, 2014

A few years ago,  Santa Cruz seemed to have more good players hiding in the woodwork than any other city its size. But this week, one of them has come out of hiding in a big way! I refer to James Tarjan, a grandmaster and frequent contender for the U.S. championship in the 1970s who […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Impulse Control

July 28, 2014

After my epic fail yesterday against Josiah Stearman… number two 10-year-old in the country Josiah Stearman, that is… I just had to go over the game and see what I did wrong. It’s actually a very complicated question. But let’s get to the position where the game finally, irrevocably became an Epic Fail. FEN: r3qr1k/ppp3Rp/3p3P/3Ppb2/2PnNp2/8/PP2BPP1/R2QK3 […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →