Anticipation of Things Future

by admin on December 31, 2022

Fifteen years ago, when I started this blog, I called the first post Remembrance of Things Past. It seems like an odd way to begin a chronicle that literally had no past at that point. But it gives me a perfect title for today’s entry, written on the last day of the year, which will be the 1245th and last post of this blog. I’ll call it “Anticipation of Things Future.”

First, I owe a little bit of explanation to the small group of people who read this blog regularly. Why didn’t I tell you that I was going to wrap this blog up so soon? The answer is that I didn’t know! I made up my mind just within the last week. One day I was talking with my wife about some computer issues I’ve been having. My laptop has been getting increasingly finicky, and I complained to her that I will probably have to get a new one soon. But why should I? This blog is essentially the only thing I use my laptop for. For everything else I use my desktop computer, a Mac. The only reason I keep a toe in the Microsoft Windows world is that Fritz, the computer chess program, runs on Windows.

And that’s when it hit me. When this blog was fresh and new, I wouldn’t have thought twice about getting a new laptop. But the fact that I wasn’t really even sure that it was worth it… means that it isn’t worth it. Or to put it in a more positive way: I’ve accomplished everything I ever wanted to with this blog. I’m satisfied. I can let it go now.

As I’m sure many of you have noticed, but have been too polite to say, my blog has been losing momentum for several years. I write fewer posts and have fewer readers than I used to. In 2015, my peak year, the blog had 56,545 views and I wrote 93 posts. This year I’ve had 10,002 views and written 27 posts. (Thanks to the five people who have viewed it so far today, putting it over the 10,000 threshold on the very last day of the year!)

That’s one reason for wrapping it up, but not the decisive one. If I still had a lot of things I wanted to say, it wouldn’t matter whether the audience was large or small. But the pandemic, and my exit from regular tournament chess, has given me less to write about. I tried getting back into the tournament scene this year, playing two tournaments, but both of them were disasters.

I felt guilty about those bad tournaments, guilty because I let my readers down and myself down. I do not want this blog to turn into a woe-is-me recap of my defeats. At this point I’m still undecided about whether and how much I’m going to get back into tournament chess, but doing it just so that I can keep my blog going seems like the wrong reason. I have to admit that my desire to play tournament chess is waning. More and more, I find myself thinking that it’s time for White and Black to end their endless battle, shake hands and declare a truce.

Finally, this blog is a lot of work. I have always really worked hard on crafting my posts — and it seems as if I work harder and harder as time goes on. I do love the craft of writing, but maybe there are other things that I should use it on.

Now that I have thoroughly depressed all of you, let me talk about the positives! First of all, I am so grateful to everyone who has read and enjoyed this blog. It constantly amazed me when people would come up to me at tournaments and say, “I read your blog.” It made me feel as if I was someone in the chess world, and also that I was writing something that people enjoyed.

I also loved the comments, which were of such high quality and often taught me things that I didn’t know. That’s one thing that makes a blog more satisfying than a diary. A diary entry just sits there, exactly the way that you wrote it, but a blog post spontaneously grows into something better.

For me, one unexpected joy of this blog was the way that it intertwined with Mike Splane’s chess parties, which he organized monthly from about 2009 to 2021. Mike was, among other distinctions, the most frequent commenter on this blog. His chess parties gave me great material, from games to philosophical insights like how to form a plan, and why forced moves are often underrated. I’m happy that I was able to use this blog to introduce readers to ideas like the Mike Splane Question. Also I’ve been able to publicize his book, Chess Wizardry, both here and in Chess Life. I was thrilled when John Watson wrote a review of Mike’s book in the October 2022 issue of Chess Life! It’s as if we’re keeping Mike alive, in a small way.

Another satisfying thing that happened very late in the lifetime of this blog was winning the Chess Journalists of America award for Best Chess Blog in 2021. I never expected to get any kind of award for this blog, and I think I earned it in part just for sticking around long enough! In 2007, when I started, blogs were all the rage, but very few blogs from that era on any subject are still going. I’d like to think that the award also was a public recognition of 50 Years of Chess, my pandemic project in which I wrote 50 posts on my 50 years in chess, highlighting one game per year. In fact, the one piece of unfinished business for this blog is to collect all of those posts into one downloadable PDF. If I can do that easily, I’ll post the PDF in January 2023.

Now let me turn to the title of this post: anticipation of things future. What is left to look forward to? Well, first, I look forward to trying to get back into tournaments again, doing it for the right reasons and perhaps being better prepared. There’s a new group organizing tournaments in California called 1000 Grandmasters, whose goal is to create a chess “ecosystem” in the U.S. that would make it possible for the country to support 1000 grandmasters. It’s been a problem since forever: so many of the most talented players get to the end of their teenage years or their college years and find that chess is just not a realistic profession. 1000 Grandmasters hopes to change this with a donation-based model. To some extent, Rex Sinquefield is already doing that, but you always have to worry about the sustainability of a model that relies on the generosity of one person. We’ll see if 1000 Grandmasters can offer a better or at least a complementary approach.

What would it take to have 1000 grandmasters in the U.S.? That would be about three grandmasters per million people — the same relative population as in Lithuania (3.05 per million) and the Czech Republic (2.85 per million) and far fewer than Iceland (36.92 per million). But it would be a twelve-fold increase for the United States (0.25 per million, as of 2013). It seems scarcely possible… but “impossible” is the sort of thing that old people say. We’re talking today about reasons to look forward.

Also in the “anticipation of things future” department, I hope to get to work on a new mathematics book in 2023. I have a co-author, and we’ve sent out a proposal, but it’s been harder than expected to get an agent interested. The first two declined. The third one sounded extremely enthusiastic when we contacted him in November, but now we haven’t heard from him for a month and I have to wonder what’s going on. If it doesn’t work out with him, maybe we will go back to pitching publishers without an agent, because I know of at least two publishers that would be interested.

Maybe I will also look for new volunteer opportunities. At age 64, I really don’t have to hustle for work as much as I once did, and I would like to try to find other ways to make a difference. Writing books is one way, but also I’ve been thinking about things like sponsoring or helping refugee families. Or maybe teaching chess in the prisons. Or … ? I’ve barely even begun to think about the possibilities. I should try to think of this phase of my life as a time to feel more free than before, and free especially to try new things.

Of course, trying new things inevitably means letting go of some old things, but there is nothing wrong with that. Especially when the old thing has given me as much joy as this blog. There’s a lot of satisfaction in putting the last pot into the kiln, the last stitch into the quilt, or the last period on the page, and saying, “There. It is finished.”

Thanks, once again, to all of you for reading.

Finally, if any of you want to contact me for any reason, and if you’re not a bot, my e-mail is scribe (at) danamackenzie (dot) com. I’ll be glad to hear from you.

Happy New Year!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

{ 20 comments }

A Fine Rook Endgame, Part 4

by admin on December 22, 2022

Today I’m going to finish my series of posts on one of the classic rook-and-pawn endgames: the endgame with balanced pawns on the kingside, and with one player enjoying an outside passed pawn on the queenside. The prototypical position is number 367 in Reuben Fine’s Basic Chess Endings, which is why I’ve been calling it the “Fine endgame.”

The Fine Endgame. With White to move, it’s a draw.

In Part 2 we went over this position with a Fine-tooth comb (ha, ha) and found that there are more possibilities in the position than he let on. His summary judgment that all such endgames are drawn appears to be much too hasty. In Part 3, we looked at a tiny modification of this position, moving White’s rook from a8 to a7, where White seems to be winning! In Part 4, I want to look at what this means for practical endgames. What if White or Black have worse king position? What if the passed pawn hasn’t advanced so far?

Let me start with the game that got me interested in this topic. One of my students, Emmy (rated about 500) reached the following position. Her opponent, I think, was about 1000 strength. So it’s fair to assume that neither of them have studied this sort of endgame before.

Position after 31. … Kxf8. White to move.

FEN: 5k2/1R3p2/p5p1/7p/8/7P/P1r2PPK/8 w – – 0 32

Here Emmy, as White, played 32. Rb6? In a certain sense this mistake doesn’t matter, because she will get more chances to put the rook in the correct place. But it’s disappointing that she didn’t realize yet that the ideal square is a7. First, because rooks belong behind passed pawns (the Tarrasch Rule). Second, because the rook on the seventh rank limits the activity of Black’s king. And third, because it eyes the pawn on f7, which we’ve seen can be an important pawn.

It’s also worth pointing out that there was no need to play 32. Ra7 just yet. White could also play 32. a4 Rc4 33. a5 Rc5. What is the point of this, besides prolonging the agony? Well, it forces Black’s rook to a less aggressive position after 34. Ra7 Rxa5. This may allow White’s king more freedom of movement.

Finally, there’s the question of pawn structure on the kingside. Where would White like to put her pawns? From parts 1-3, we know that the ideal formation is f2-g3-h4. So White could also think about moves like h4, Kg3, Kf3, and g3.

If you’ve read parts 1-3, all of these ideas are more or less obvious. Watch how Emmy gets into a more and more uncomfortable position because she doesn’t know these basic ideas.

32. … Rxa2 33. Rb8+ Kg7 34. Kg3 g5!

I like this move. White now can’t get to the ideal setup with pawns on f2, g3, h4, and king on f3.

35. Ra8 Ra3+ 36. Kh2 …

A painful choice. White’s king is going to be buried. Probably 36. f3 was better, fighting for every inch of space. After 36. … f5 or 36. … Ra4 White could try 37. h4!?

36. … h4 37. f3 Ra1 38. Ra7 f6 39. Ra8 Kf5 40. Ra7 f6 41. Ra8 Kf4 42. Ra7 Ke3?

Position after 42. … Ke3. White to move.

FEN: 8/R7/p4p2/6p1/7p/4kP1P/6PK/r7 w – – 0 43

Black makes his first mistake of the endgame. If he had studied the previous posts, he would know that White has a much worse version of the Fine position — a not-Fine-at-all position. Black should be able to win by pushing his pawn to a3 and bringing his king to the queenside. Fine’s usual drawing method for White — sacrifice the rook for the a-pawn, then push the kingside pawns — is not going to work here because the pawns are so far back and the king is so passive.

It’s ironic that Black failed to exploit the most obvious advantage in his position, the passed a-pawn. The farther you push that pawn, the more dangerous it becomes. (This rule only applies until it reaches a3. As I’ve said before, you have to be careful about pushing all the way to a2 because it introduces perpetual-check motifs for the defender.) Because Black has left it on a6, White has time to take some pawns on the kingside and then bring her rook back to the queenside.

43. Rf7! …

I’m delighted that Emmy found this move.

43. … Kf2

Black continues to play on the wrong side of the board. Admittedly, this looks very dangerous but it’s a middlegame move, not an endgame move. Black is trying to checkmate White, which shouldn’t work.

44. Rxf6 Rg1 45. Rxa6 …

Black has burned his bridges on the queenside. Now it’s win on the kingside or bust.

45. … Rxg2+ 46. Kh1 Kg3 47. Ra5 Kxh3

Position after 47. … Kxh3. White to move.

FEN: 8/8/8/R5p1/7p/5P1k/6r1/7K w – – 0 48

Here, again, I think it helps to know the endgame. Unless Black can win the f-pawn outright, it should be a draw. So White’s paramount objective should be either to hold the f-pawn or trade it for Black’s g-pawn. Looking more carefully at the position, notice that any Black attempt to win the f-pawn will instead hang the g-pawn. So … Kg3 runs into Rxg5+. If … R-?2 (where “?” is any letter from b to f), then Rxg5 both wins the g-pawn and defends against the back-rank mate. If … Rg3 White can just pass with any rook move on the fifth rank. Thus, because any attempt by Black to improve his position will fail, White can simply pass. All she needs to do is play R-?5, where “?” is any letter from b to f. Admittedly, this is a pretty subtle idea and so it is not too surprising that Emmy played

48. Ra4?? Rf2

Now the game is lost because Black wins the f-pawn and has a two-pawn lead. However, Emmy loses the thread here and forgets about the main threat.

49. Ra5?? Rf1 mate.

Now I’d like to show one more Fine-like endgame from my own tournament experience. Here I was playing a future Grandmaster, who was at the time “just” a 2200-level player, around the same rating as me. I was Black and got to the very promising position below.

Steven Zierk — Dana Mackenzie

2008 Memorial Day Classic

Position after 21. Rfd1. Black to move.

FEN: r1r3k1/p4ppp/8/3p1b2/8/N1P5/P4PPP/R2R2K1 b – – 0 21

What’s this? A position with minor pieces on the board, not just rooks? Well, one of the benefits of studying any simple endgame (K+P, R+P, etc.) is to help us orient ourselves in the more complex endgames that precede them. In this position, I clearly failed to make the most of my advantage. I was too impatient to activate my rooks, and I did not think enough about things like White’s stranded knight, how to maximize the advantage of my bishop over his knight, and whether I could do better than just trading into a rook endgame. The move I played was 21. … Rxc3?, and we’ll look at it a bit later. But first I’d like to look at the best move for Black:

21. … Rc5!

Black’s rook and bishop dominate the White knight, which has no moves. The rook move also serves two other useful purposes, threatening to double on the c-file and protecting the vulnerable d5-pawn. It’s very disappointing to me that I missed a move which had so many obvious strong points. Also, more subtly, we’ll see that Black gets a better rook and pawn endgame by avoiding the temptation to go into the rook and pawn endgame too soon with 21. … Rxc3. Patience is always a virtue in chess!

22. Rd2 …

Because this is not an actual game variation, I am mostly going to show you best play for both sides according to the computer. I’m almost certain that Zierk would have played this move.

22. … g6

Also possible is 22. … Kf8, leading to a very similar sort of position. I think that 22. … g6 is more obvious, though. It protects the bishop and thus establishes Rxc3 as a more serious threat, and it also prevents back-rank mates.

23. Nc2 Bxc2!?

A surprising move, because we’ve just avoided a B-for-N trade two moves earlier. But now, thanks to the tempo gained with … Rc5, Black has a tactic that wins a pawn by force. Also, Black judges here that once White’s knight gets to d4, Black won’t have the superior minor piece any more.

24. Rxc2 d4 25. c4 R8c8 26. R1c1 d3! 27. Rc3 d2 28. Rd1 …

White is forced to give up the c-pawn to prevent Black from promoting.

28. … Rxc4 29. Rxc4 Rxc4 30. Kf1 …

White has to guard against the back-rank mate. This allows Black enough time to win the a-pawn.

30. … Rc2 31. a4 Ra2 32. Ke2 Kg7 33. Rxd2 Rxa4

Position after 33. … Rxa4 (analysis). White to move.

FEN: 8/p4pkp/6p1/8/r7/8/3RKPPP/8 w – – 0 34

Getting at last to a rook-and-pawn endgame with a passed a-pawn. Black is hoping to get to the Finer position (which would be a win, part 3) but not the Fine position (which would be a draw, part 2). However, in everyday, garden-variety endgames like this one, he isn’t able to reach either position. Let’s see what happens when Black tries to do so.

34. Rd7 a5

Here I would perhaps lean towards … h5 followed by … Kf6, to activate my king first. However, Fritz (the computer) has a strong preference for pushing the a-pawn first. As we saw in our first endgame, pushing the passed pawn is important to establish it as a real threat!

In any case, the computer’s move is a principled move. To reach either the Fine position or the Finer position, Black needs to push his pawn to a3. However, there is a cost: the tempi Black spends pushing the pawn are not spent activating the king. As a result, Black’s king will be too passively posted and the position will be a draw.

35. Ra7 Ra2+ 36. Ke3 a4

Again, no fooling around — Black means business with his a-pawn. But this gives White time to shut Black’s king out of the third rank.

37. Ra6 a3

Position after 37. … a3 (analysis). White to move.

FEN: 8/5pkp/R5p1/8/8/p3K3/r4PPP/8 w – – 0 38

As we can see, Black has tried and failed to get to the Finer position. His rook and pawn are in the right place, but his king is still stuck back on g7, instead of on f6 where it should be. If Black wants to activate his king, he will have to come around via the back route, f8-e8-d8 etc., and this will cost him at least the f-pawn, as we discussed in part 2.

This example may explain Fine’s judgment that such endgames are typically drawn. To even have a chance to win, the stronger side needs to advance the pawn to the sixth rank. But in most practical cases, that takes time. The defender has ways to take advantage of that time. He can cut off Black’s king, as he has done here. In other cases, he might be able to make his own king more active — say, marching it to g5 in case Black’s king commits to the queenside. Or maybe White can play g4 and h4, preventing Black from achieving the desirable pawn chain f7-g6-h5 or bringing about favorable pawn exchanges. The only way for White to lose would be to sit around and do nothing, so that Black can advance the pawn to a3 and then play the “bridge-building” maneuver that I wrote about in Part 3.

Believe me, I’ve looked at a zillion variations to see if there is some way that I could have forced a win against Zierk in this endgame, but I have not found one. Black certainly had winning chances, but not a forced win.

I’m sure that some of you are curious about what actually happened, because as I’ve said, all of the above is computer analysis. What really happened (going back to the first Zierk-Mackenzie position) was

21. … Rxc3? 22. Rxd5 Rxa3 23. Rxf5 Rc8

Position after 23. … Rc8. White to move.

FEN: 2r3k1/p4ppp/8/5R2/8/r7/P4PPP/R5K1 w – – 0 24

The threat, of course, is 24. … Rxa2, when White can’t recapture because of a back-rank mate. I thought I was just winning a pawn, which is probably why I was so willing to trade my bishop for his knight. But as we have seen, winning a pawn is no guarantee of victory in a rook-and-pawn endgame!

24. Kf1 f6

Stopping back-rank threats, and also preventing him from defending the a-pawn via Rf5-e5-e2.

25. Rf3! …

I greatly underestimated this move. First, it saves the a-pawn for the time being. And even though White’s pawn formation on the kingside is wrecked, that is not usually fatal in these endgames. If White is able to advance his pawn to f5, it will actually be quite a strong pawn formation.

25. … Rxf3 26. gf Rc2 27. a4 …

Position after 27. a4. Black to move.

FEN: 6k1/p5pp/5p2/8/P7/5P2/2r2P1P/R4K2 b – – 0 27

Here I made an instructive mistake.

27. … a5?

Probably played with a few seconds’ thought at most. I missed the fact that Steven’s doubled f-pawns (those supposedly weak doubled f-pawns) allow him to defend the a-pawn horizontally, with Ra1-e1-e4. For that reason, it was essential for me to play 27. … Rc4! 28. a5 and now 28. … a6!, when White can no longer play horizontal defense because his rook can’t go to e5. However, I think that White still has very good chances to save a draw if he activates his rook and does not bother with hanging on to the a-pawn. So I would recommend 29. Kg2 Rc5 30. Rb1! Rxa5 31. Rb7, followed by Ra7, f4, and f5, when will be hard for Black ever to free his king. Again, I’ve looked long and hard at this on the computer and have not found any forced wins for Black.

28. Re1! Kf7 29. Re4 …

White has consolidated and I never was able to win a pawn. The game finished as follows:

29. … Ra2 30. Kg2 g6 31. f4 f5 32. Rd4 Ke6 33. Kg3 Ra3+ 34. f3 Rb3 35. Rc4 Rb4 36. Rc7 Rxa4 37. Rxh7 Ra1 38. Ra7 Kd5 39. Kh4 Kd4 40. Kg5 Rg1+ 41. Kh6 Rg1+ 42. Rxa5 Kxf4 43. Ra6 Kxf3 44. Rxg6 Rh1 45. Kg5 Rh2 1/2 – 1/2

A really convincing endgame save by the future GM Zierk.

Thanks for my readers’ patience during this long series! You’re probably sick of rook and pawn endgames by now. Take-home points from this last installment:

  • For beginners, it all starts with the Tarrasch Rule. Rooks belong behind passed pawns, whether it’s the defender’s rook or the attacker’s rook.
  • For more advanced players, everything in this endgame matters. Advancing the pawn to the sixth rank (but not the seventh) matters. Having an active rook, ideally on the seventh rank, matters. Active king position matters. Pawn structure on the kingside matters (with f2-g3-h4 or f7-g5-h5 being best). If the player with the extra pawn is deficient in one of these areas, he probably won’t have a forced win. If the defender is deficient in one of those areas, he is in danger of losing.
  • For the player with the extra pawn, giving up the passed a-pawn to win a pawn on the kingside is generally not a winning strategy.
  • Think hard before trading into a R+P endgame with an outside passed pawn. If you are the defender and a pawn down, it may be the only way to save the game… but the draw may not be as easy as you think (if you’ve read books like Fine’s). If you are the player with the extra pawn, you will probably have winning chances but not a forced win. If you have other options that give you a clearer advantage, you should probably go for them.
  • If you do get into this endgame and have the extra pawn, try to head for the Finer position (with the rook on a7) rather than the Fine position (with the rook on a8). Be bold about moving your king to the queenside. And try to set up the bridge-building maneuver discovered by Steckner, with Ra7-c7-(c2, c4, or c6)-(a2, a4 or a6), which is the key to winning that position.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

{ 0 comments }

A Fine Rook Endgame, Part 3

December 3, 2022

I hope you’re ready for some very, very challenging endgame analysis! Today we’ll have what I think is the most difficult and interesting of my four posts on what I call the “Fine endgame”: rook plus 4 pawns versus rook plus 3 pawns, with the stronger side enjoying an outside passed pawn (usually on the […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →

A Fine Rook Endgame, Part 2

November 12, 2022

Last time I introduced a new series of four posts about a very basic (but very difficult) rook and pawn endgame. It’s the endgame where one side (we’ll say White) is a pawn up, and that pawn is an outside passed pawn (we’ll say an a-pawn). As per the “Tarrasch Rule,” the best defensive position […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →

A Fine Rook Endgame, Part 1

November 6, 2022

I’m back! Actually, I never left, but this blog has been silent for seven weeks, so some of you may have been wondering where I went. My apologies: I was busy with other things (like a book proposal), but to be honest, I just didn’t have any topics that were worth writing about. I could […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →

Sifting through the Rubble

September 18, 2022

For the last month, since I got back from my disastrous tournament in Minneapolis, I haven’t shown any games from it because I thought they would be too embarrassing. But in order to learn from a failure, you have to face it and ask what happened and why. So now I’m going to start analyzing […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →

Americans Who Have Beaten World Champions

September 11, 2022

The latest news that has blown up the chess Internet came in two waves last week. First, at the Sinquefield Cup in St. Louis, world champion Magnus Carlsen lost a game to a young but rapidly improving American grandmaster, Hans Niemann. Hans grew up in the San Francisco area, so people around here were full […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →

One Day in Reykjavik

September 2, 2022

Sadly, I was rooting for the wrong guy. This month’s Chess Life has an interesting 50-year retrospective on the Fischer-Spassky match. I thought that the most insightful article was a short interview with IM Anthony Saidy, who hosted Fischer at his house before Fischer left for Iceland. Here is one thing I did not know. […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →

Chess, Capitalism, and Chess.com

August 28, 2022

To take my mind off my recent “terrible, horrible, no good, very bad” chess tournament, here are some thoughts on other things going on in the chess world… My friend Gjon Feinstein has alerted me several times to a YouTube channel called “Chess Dojo” (https://www.youtube.com/c/ChessDojo), a project of GM Jesse Kraai, IM David Pruess, and […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →

Epic Success and Epic Fail

August 25, 2022

For the last week I have been in Minnesota, playing in the Minnesota International Chess Festival, which was organized superbly by Alex Betaneli. It may have been the strongest event held in Minnesota since the HB Global Challenge in 2004. But that event was done in by its enormous ambition: a half-million dollar prize fund, […]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Read the full article →