The Joke’s on Me

by admin on November 22, 2015

“Hey, I just saw this great game by some kid from Brooklyn, Bobby what’s-his-name … you won’t believe it, he sacrificed his queen and won, like, 15 moves later. Here, let me show you!”

Among all the possible conversational gaffes that a chess player could make, this is probably the only one that would be worse than what I did this afternoon. But let me back up. In my last post I wrote about a game between my friend, Austen Green, and his teacher, Keaton Kiewra, that began as follows:

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cd 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Be2 Qc7 6. Nc3 a6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Be3 d6 9. f4 Be7 (diagram)

wei austenPosition after 9. … Be7. White to move.

FEN: r1b1k2r/1pq1bppp/p1nppn2/8/3NPP2/2N1B3/PPP1B1PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq – 0 10

Here Austen played 10. Bf3, but I was curious what the theory is in this position, so I got into ChessBase and looked it up. The position has occurred in hundreds of games, and usually White plays 10. Kh1 and 11. Qe1, in some order. One of the top games listed in this line (which means one of the most recent games played by super-GM’s) was Wei Yi versus Lazaro Bruzon Batista. So I thought okay, I’ll play over that game and see how Wei handled it.

I did not know that I was about to see the #1 brilliancy of 2015.

The fireworks began on move 21, in this position:

wei 1Position after 20. … hg. White to move.

FEN: 3qr1k1/1b1rbp2/p2p1np1/1p2p3/4P3/P1NBB2Q/1PP3PP/4RR1K w – - 0 21

Interestingly enough, this position has occurred in master play before, but Wei was the first person to find the best continuation:

21. Nd5! Nxd5?

Here Bruzon could have perhaps minimized the damage with 21. … Bxd5. But a move like this is positional capitulation, so it is no surprise that Bruzon played the much more natural capture. However, he leaves the door open for an unbelievable combination. Do you see it? Of course you see it, because this is the most talked-about game of 2015. But I didn’t know that, so I was stunned when I saw Wei’s next move.

wei 2Position after 21. … Nxd5. White to move.

FEN: 3qr1k1/1b1rbp2/p2p2p1/1p1np3/4P3/P2BB2Q/1PP3PP/4RR1K w – - 0 22

Here Wei played the shot heard round the world: 22. Rxf7!! The idea is clear enough: White is ripping away the defenses around Black’s king and forcing him to wander out into the center of the board. There is no declining the sacrifice with 22. … Nf6 because of 23. Qe6! Kh8 24. Bg5. So Black had to play 22. … Kxf7 23. Qh7+ Ke6. (Not 23. … Kf8? 24. Bh6 mate and not 23. … Kf6? 24. ed!)

By the way, this last variation is emblematic of the whole sacrifice. Over and over Wei had to keep finding ingenious moves that were not checks. That’s one of the things that made the combination so spectacular. I’ll just show you one more example: after 24. ed+ Kxd5 (If 24. … Bxd5 what is White’s best move? Hint: It’s not a check!) 25. Be4+!! Kxe4 what would you play?

wei 3Position after 25. … Kxe4. White to move.

FEN: 3qr3/1b1rb2Q/p2p2p1/1p2p3/4k3/P3B3/1PP3PP/4R2K w – - 0 26

Okay, admit it. If you’re an ordinary human, not a computer, you would play a check here. You’d play 26. Bb6+, winning Black’s queen. Or you’d play 26. Qxg6+. But neither of these moves is winning, because White has already sacrificed so much material. Instead, Wei found the sensational quiet move 26. Qf7!!, which threatens mate on f3 and also takes away Black’s main flight squares, d5 and f5.

In king hunt situations, it is usually more efficient to take away flight squares than to keep pursuing the king with checks.

By the way, many self-proclaimed experts on the Internet are very pleased with themselves for noticing that their computers give 26. c4!! as a faster win. To me, this matters not one whit. Wei’s move is beautiful, and it wins. What more could one want?

Ordinarily I would keep going and show you the rest of the game, which lasted 10 more moves and contained at least three more moves that are just as incredible as 26. Qf7. But the thing is, you can find this game analyzed in a hundred places on the Internet, in YouTube videos and on and on and everywhere else. If, like me, you hadn’t seen it before, do yourself a favor and go look up how the rest of it went.

Silly me, I didn’t do that. I thought that I had just discovered a little-known masterpiece. So when I got together with Eric Fingal, Mike Splane, and Gjon Feinstein for a miniature chess party this afternoon, I was so psyched. “I have a great game to show you!!” I said.

That’s when I got my rude awakening. “You mean the game that they’re calling the Immortal Game of the 21st Century?” Gjon said. “You mean the game that’s all over the Internet?” Mike said. “No, it can’t be!” I said. “This game was just played a few months ago, like in July. It hasn’t had time to become an Immortal Game yet.”

Then they started calling out the moves, and I had to admit it was the same game. (Okay, I exaggerate — they weren’t calling out the moves, but they were nodding their heads and saying yep, I’ve seen that.)

So… Yes, the joke’s on me. I looked like a complete doofus. On the other hand, I feel lucky that I discovered the game the way I did — not knowing anything about it, not knowing that it was this great and famous brilliancy, so that everything in the game came as a complete surprise to me. I also did my own analysis of the whole combination instead of reading everybody else’s computer-aided analysis, which also helped me appreciate it more.

By the way, there’s one thing that Mike said which surprised me, and I wonder if anyone else can either confirm it or refute it. He said that the whole thing was home preparation, or at least, he didn’t know how much was prep and how much was over-the-board inspiration, and for that reason he didn’t find it all that impressive.

Does anyone know if Wei prepared 22. Rxf7!! at home? It’s definitely true, as I said, that the position on move 20 had occurred before, and up to move 15 or 16 or so the players were following a main line. But I haven’t seen any commentaries on the Internet that say definitely that he prepared it. The great majority of the commentaries are filled with praise for this move, and only a few say that there is a possibility it was home preparation.

I think it’s important. If Wei found 22. Rxf7!! over the board, this is one of the greatest king hunts in history. It’s way better than Lasker-Thomas, which some people have compared it to, because every move of Lasker-Thomas was a check. What makes this king hunt so fabulous is that it has four non-checks.

On the other hand, if Wei got to this position on his computer and saw that White had a +4-pawn advantage, then I agree with Mike that it takes some of the luster off the combination. Wei still had to find some fabulous moves, but it’s easier to find a fabulous move if you know that you’re supposed to be winning.

For now, I will assume the best, and join the chorus of people cheering this game as a fantastic brilliancy and an honorable sequel to the game played by that kid from Brooklyn. You know, Bobby what’s-his-name…


Print Friendly


The Perils (and Rewards) of Doing Nothing

by admin on November 18, 2015

At Mike Splane’s latest chess party, Austen Green showed one of his games from the recent U.S. Game/30 championship. Although his score was only 2½ out of 5, he beat an International Master and drew a Grandmaster, so it was a very good tournament for him. He raised his rating from 2221 to 2235.

The victory over an IM was especially sweet because the victim was his coach, Keaton Kiewra (2529). Austen has been taking long-distance lessons because Kiewra lives in Texas, and this was the first time they’ve met (at least over the chessboard). I’d say that Austen schooled his coach!

So how do you beat your coach, and score a 300-point upset in the process? Basically by being extremely patient. Austen got to a position where Kiewra had no counterplay and then just sat and waited, doing nothing until the time was right. Kiewra, for his part, also played a “do-nothing” strategy. It seemed as if he wanted to win this game by waiting until Austen screwed up.

In some ways it wasn’t a great game for spectators, because of all the waiting, but I think it’s instructive because it shows that certain kinds of doing nothing are good and certain kinds are not.

Here is the first place where Kiewra could have done something. Austen is White and Kiewra is Black.

kiewra 3Position after 23. R1e1. Black to move.

FEN: 2r3k1/1p2rppp/p2p4/4nP2/P1qB1Q2/8/1PP1R1PP/4R1K1 b – - 0 23

The opening was a Scheveningen Sicilian that has gone pretty well for White. Black has a permanently weak pawn on d6, White has more space on the kingside and has a dangerous-looking pawn on f5. Black’s knight is pretty on e5 but it’s also pinned, and in danger of just being a bystander. Finally, note that White’s a4 pawn is not hanging because 23. … Qxa4?? would be met by 24. Bxe5 winning a piece.

Basically, almost all the positional factors are in White’s favor, and Black is in danger of being slowly squeezed to death. For that reason I think it was imperative for Black to seize his opportunity to trade off the knight for the bishop and escape the pin on the e-file. After 23. … Nf3+! 24. Qxf3 Qxd4+ 25. Qf2 Black has two options. He can trade down to a slightly worse but almost certainly drawable rook endgame with 25. … Qxf2+ 26. Kxf2 Rxe2+ 27. Rxe2 Kf8. Or, if he wants to be more ambitious, he can win two rooks for a queen with 25. … Rxe2 26. Qxd4 Rxe1+. Although Black’s d6 pawn will fall, so will White’s c2 pawn after 27. Kf2 Rc1, and with the rooks connected Black is in no danger of losing.

Why didn’t Kiewra do this? I can only speculate. I think his strategy in this game was to play it safe, safe, safe — do nothing that requires any calculation, but keep pieces on the board to preserve the possibility of a screw-up by his lower-rated opponent. He didn’t like the rook endgame because there is too little screw-up potential, and he didn’t like the 2R vs. Q endgame because it’s always scary to fight against a queen.

Instead the game went 23. … f6 24. b3 Qc6 25. Bb2 Rce8 26. Kf1! (Austen isn’t going to allow the Nf3+ trick again) Qd7 27. Ba3 (piling up pressure against Black’s isolated pawn) Rc8 28. Qe4 Rc6 29. c4 (queenside clamp) Kh8 30. g4 (kingside clamp) Re8 31. h3 (diagram).

kiewra 4Position after 31. h3.

FEN: 4r2k/1p1q2pp/p1rp1p2/4nP2/P1P1Q1P1/BP5P/4R3/4RK2 b – - 0 31

Here is Kiewra’s second opportunity to do something. Austen’s last move (which I think was not best) gave him a chance to scramble the position with 31. … b5! 32. ab ab 33. cb Rc3! White cannot hold all of his weak pawns at b3, b5, and h3. In this line, Black has finally gotten some activity for his pieces, and if anything, White is now in a bit more danger than Black.

Again it’s hard to see why an IM like Kiewra would pass up this opportunity. But he continued playing passively, with 31. … h6 32. Qd5 (preventing … b5) Qc7 33. Re3 (prophylaxis — defending his weak points on b3 and h3, just in case) Qb6 34. Kg2 Kh7 35. R1e2 (prophylaxis again — Austen foresees the possibility of a knight coming to g4 and the queen to f2, and stops it in advance).

kiewra 5Position after 35. R1e2. Black to move.

FEN: 4r3/1p4pk/pqrp1p1p/3QnP2/P1P3P1/BP2R2P/4R1K1/8 b – - 0 35

I’ve written before about the art of doing nothing, or in Russian, nichevo-ne-dyelanye. Mike Splane is always looking for secrets that separate grandmasters from ordinary masters, and I think this is one of them. Grandmasters are better at doing nothing. But they are also better at timing — knowing when it’s right to do nothing, and when it’s time to do something.

There’s a good way of doing nothing and a bad way. The good way is to make tiny, incremental improvements to your position while awaiting the right moment to open lines. The wrong way is to miss the right moments to open lines, while doing nothing to improve your position. In short, the right way is to play exactly the way Austen has done in this game. The wrong way is to do what Kiewra has done. You would think that Austen is the 2500 player and Kiewra is the 2200 player.

But now an interesting psychological moment occurs. Kiewra does nothing in such a provocative way that Austen is finally goaded into action.

35. … Rb8!?

Whaaat? The only point behind this move is to unpin the knight, but why put your rook at b8? It makes no sense. As Austen said, it’s as if Kiewra is waving a red flag, “Come and get me!” And so Austen did:

36. h4?! …

Which was exactly the wrong thing to do! Except that it worked, so it was the right thing. Chess is confusing sometimes…

White could continue playing the maneuvering game as long as he wants. I’m a fan of the idea of putting the queen on d1, lining up both rooks on the d-file in front of it, and then playing h4. White maximizes his pressure both in the center and on the kingside. I’m not really sure how Black can hang on to the d-pawn over the long term, if his knight has to come back to f7 and if White is then able to chase it with g5 and g6. Of course, White has to be careful about not leaving Black opportunities for counterplay, but time is on his side. He can let the game go to move 100 if he wants.

Instead Austen let himself be provoked into sacrificing a pawn, and it’s not clear that he is quite ready for it. So we could say that Kiewra’s rope-a-dope strategy was a success — if he had handled the ensuing complications correctly. But he didn’t. Which is another bad thing about playing rope-a-dope: it demands perfect execution and Petrosian-like calm.

36. … Nxg4 37. Rg3 h5??

The losing move. Black just has to retreat his knight back to e5, resuming his obstructionist policy. He probably didn’t do this because the exchange sac 38. Rxe5 looks ultra-scary. But it’s not! After 37. … Ne5 38. Rxe5?? de 39. Qf7 Rg8 White can try either 40. Bf8 or 40. Bc1 but neither one works after 40. … Qc7, contesting the seventh rank just in the nick of time. (40. … Rc7 also works.) Of course White doesn’t have to sacrifice the exchange, but then his attack is just a little bit nebulous. Maybe he has compensation for the pawn, but not more.

After the text move, though, White is clearly winning, and Austen proves it in fine style.

kiewra 6Position after 37. … h5?? White to move.

FEN: 1r6/1p4pk/pqrp1p2/3Q1P1p/P1P3nP/BP4R1/4R1K1/8 w – - 0 38

First step is to infiltrate with the queen: 38. Qf7! Black can’t defend the h5 pawn, because 38. … Kh6?? 39. Qg6+ would be mate. Kiewra played 38. … Rc7 39. Qxh5+ Nh6 40. Bc1! (All of White’s pieces are now participating in the attack) Qc6+ 41. Kh2 d5 (finally getting some activity, but it’s too little too late) 42. Bxh6 gh 43. Rg6 (43. Re6 is quicker, but this move also works.) Qd6+ 44. Kh1 Qf8 (Austen missed this defensive trick, but no problem — he’s still winning) 45. Re6 Rf7 and now it’s White to play and win.

kiewra 7Position after 45. … Rf7. White to move.

FEN: 1r3q2/1p3r1k/p3RpRp/3p1P1Q/P1P4P/1P6/8/7K w – - 0 46

Austen played 46. Rxh6+!, which simply wins a pawn and gets all the pieces off the board. After 46. … Qxh6 47. Qxf7+ Qg7 48. Qh5+ Kg8 49. cd Rc8 50. Re8+ Rxe8 51. Qxe8+ Kh7 52. Qg6+! Black resigned. In the king-and-pawn endgame he can’t stop both the h-pawn and the d-pawn.

Not a perfect game, but very instructive. First, when you’re in a defensive position and your opponent gives you a chance to bust out, do it! Kiewra was just courting disaster by playing his rope-a-dope non-strategy.

On the other hand, when you are in control of the position, and your opponent has weaknesses that won’t go away, very often the right thing to do is sit on the position for a while, play on different parts of the board, and keep your opponent guessing about when and where you are going to strike. Austen’s patience in this game was really admirable, and if he made any error it was not being even more patient.

Print Friendly


USCL Quarterfinal Thoughts

November 10, 2015

Not much going on in my chess life right now, so I’ll write a little bit more about the U.S. Chess League. The playoffs are entering their second round, and now all of the top teams are in action. On paper we should have some very close matches, with New Jersey (6½ in the regular […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Never Again!

October 30, 2015

Today I swear I played my last game ever against my computer. If you ever see me playing one again, you have my permission to come over and unplug my computer. I know that I’ve written several entries about “Matrix chess,” and I’ve enjoyed analyzing the complicated-as-hell positions that I get into against Shredder. But […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

R.I.P. Emory Tate — My Favorite Opponent

October 18, 2015

I couldn’t believe it when I got into Facebook this morning and saw a stream of testimonials to Emory Tate. International Master Emory Tate: many times Armed Forces champion, a person full of wit and passion (especially for chess), and a chess player second to none in his imagination and attacking ability. I’m warning you […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Not Playing in Reno

October 17, 2015

Alas, this weekend I am not playing in what is usually my favorite tournament of the year, the Western States Open in Reno. I could give you a complicated explanation, but the simple explanation is family reasons. So I’m stuck at home with nobody to play but my computer. You know what that means… Matrix chess! […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Millionaire Chess: 10 Things I Think I Think

October 13, 2015

(1) Way to go, Ted Castro! I hope you aren’t too disappointed by losing your last match. I can give you nineteen thousand reasons not to be disappointed. (2) The commentators pointed this out, so I will too: You never saw so many relaxed, happy faces before the last round of a chess tournament. Although there […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

Millionaire Chess, GM Draws

October 12, 2015

It’s Millionaire Monday! The second Millionaire Chess tournament was held in Las Vegas this weekend, and the playoffs will be held today. I’m very excited to see that a couple of my Facebook friends are having sensational tournaments. Mike Zaloznyy is playing in the Open section, and in spite of having a FIDE rating under […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →

World Cup: Exhaustion Sets In

October 4, 2015

I’ve even gotten tired writing about the World Cup, imagine how tired the people are playing it. The final four-game match between Peter Svidler and Sergey Karjakin has been disappointing in a way I never expected. First, take a look at the results: Svidler 1, Karjakin 0 Svidler 1, Karjakin 0 Karjakin 1, Svidler 0 […]

Print Friendly
Read the full article →